It is ironic that ING who are supposed to be the issuers of the Bank guarantee concerned and have been aware of the existence of these bank guarantees since they were said to be issued could come out 7 months later to state the guarantees are forgeries. If the guarantees are forgeries, where are the originals of the Bank Guarantees? Bank guarantees and bank instruments; if they are forgeries, who forged them and to whom? Are they forgeries by the issuer or are forgeries to the receiving bank? Bank Guarantees are delivered bank to bank, which part of the delivery is forgery? Katota companies concerned simply needs answers. Royal Bank has given the Katota companies they are working with, satisfactory explanation for their involvement in false bank guarantee allegations and the Katota companies concerned have accepted their explanation. As far as ING is concerned the Katota companies concerned are of the opinion there is more to the letter issued than what is published. Necessary action has been initiated to recover the Katota Company’s losses as a result of the unwarranted negative publicity.
Three international banks have meanwhile indicated that these bank guarantees are forgeries.The banks,Royal Bank Baku in Azerbeidjan,Royal Investment Bank in Dubai and ING Bank in Amsterdam,said they had severed all business ties with Katota...
» 6) The documents in which Royal Investment Bank is mentioned are fraudulent, writes the bank's chief executive Mohamed Ahmadi.
» These guarantees were designed to help Katota obtain loans from international banks for its ambitious property projects in South Africa, as well as for projects elsewhere on the continent.
» The property developers were assured that funding was on the way. It would have been obtained by means of bank guarantees worth €50bn that a Philippine investor, Dr Eddie Gil, had issued to Katota.
» A property project which was supposed to be the biggest in South Africa to date is part of an massive global fraud in which falsified bank guarantees worth millions of euros were used.
» The plans of the controversial Katota Company, which undertook to buy more than 100 South African property developments worth billions, were based on guarantees that now appear to have been falsified.
» These guarantees were designed to help Katota obtain loans from international banks for its ambitious property projects in South Africa, as well as for projects elsewhere on the continent.
» The property developers were assured that funding was on the way. It would have been obtained by means of bank guarantees worth €50bn that a Philippine investor, Dr Eddie Gil, had issued to Katota.
» A property project which was supposed to be the biggest in South Africa to date is part of an massive global fraud in which falsified bank guarantees worth millions of euros were used.
» The plans of the controversial Katota Company, which undertook to buy more than 100 South African property developments worth billions, were based on guarantees that now appear to have been falsified.
|
|